The Formative Environment of Mission imperative, Gospel for All.... Rev. Dr. Sunni E. Mathew

Luke 4: 16-22.

         The Formative Environment of Mission imperative, Gospel for All

Luke chapter 4 begins with the temptation of Christ.  Temptation is in the context of Christ’s movement towards ministry in public.  Jesus’ baptism at the hands of John the Baptist highlights his identity as the Messiah who came in as the king and the suffering servant.  It speaks who Jesus is.  It also speaks, how he would engage in his mission.  Jesus builds his public ministry on the fundamental platform of this identity consciousness.  His initiation into the public ministry commenced with an intense spiritual preparation.  Retreat into the wilderness and the prayerful fasting express this thorough preparedness.  At the zenith of this wilful preparation, Satan proposes various alternatives.  The first pressing alternative was a proposal to transform the mission of the Son of God to a self-oriented productivity.  The setting of this proposal is quite interesting.  It is in the background of intense spiritual preparation.  It also highlights Jesus’ self-realization as the one sent by God; identity as Son of God.  Remaining faithful to the self-realization, Jesus makes a counter affirmation.  Human existence and the mission of the Kingdom of God is rooted in the Word of God. 
This affirmation involves a mission paradigm.  Temptation is an attempt to divert Jesus from this messianic servant-hood mission paradigm.  Luke 4: 16-22 presents the self-affirmation of Jesus as the Messiah.  It also re-iterates countering of Jesus to the satanic proposals.  It re-affirms that mission is rooted in the Word of God.  Therefore, this text has to be seen in continuity with the baptism narrative and temptation accounts.  When we try to understand the text in this continuity, we could realize Jesus’ emphasis on the paradigmatic submission to the will of God.  He re-iterates that humble submission to the will of God is the real strength in carrying out the entrusted Mission of the Kingdom of God.  It is more authentic and acceptable than the proposed call for acceptance and authority through crooked ways.  Therefore, absolute submission to the will of God is the only right method in carrying out the mission of the Kingdom.  Putting it negatively, no mission methodology without absolute submission to the will of God is real mission methodology.  This is a self-realization. 
How is this self-realization appropriated in life?  It begins in the baptismal font.  Every baptismal setting apart is the authentication of one’s identity within the framework of God’s will and purpose. That is why in our faith-culture, each one is subscribed with his/her name in the name of the Trinity; the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. How and where is this identity consciousness nurtured and re-affirmed?  The self-consciousness subscribed though baptism is realized and continually conscientized through worship and in the worship community.  This is because, worship is the space and time that reveal the Glory of God and communicate the will of God in a tangible manner.   Worship helps the individual faithful as well as the community of faithful to realize their identity and places them as mission medium within the framework of God’s will. It has a continuity structure, for it is the re-kindling of the heritage of the mission methodology inaugurated in Christ and shared through the disciples and taken over by generations of faithful people.  Hence, worship is the formative environment that re-kindles our identity consciousness.
Temple of God is the space where this self-realization is re-kindled and appropriated.  The temple-culture constructs the self-realization of the belongingness to God’s mission imperative in personal terms and as a community.  Every worship and every meditations on the word of God place a person and community within the elect, and commissioned vision of God.  The last blessing in the Holy Qurbana is an expression of this understanding.  Therefore, Christian life and its missionary commitment are always in continuum.  Worship is the space that links and transforms past commissioning into present realizations and present commitment with futuristic vision. 
 This linking and transformation happens through defining, re-defining faith identity through continuous participation in worship and interpretation of the Word of God.  Why is the study of the Word integral to the Worship and vice versa?  Is not the study or the exposition of the word of God an intellectual exercise?  According to the early teachers of faith, biblical interpretations should always be done from the platform of faith.  The reason is that, an interpretation as a mere intellectual exercise is not powerful enough to make the will of God experiential.  On the other hand, in the worship, faith of the community enhances the biblical and theological hermeneutical principles.  In reciprocation, the interpretation of the Scripture and the theological affirmations validates the faith of the community.  Therefore, both act as complementing experiences.  In that complementary state, worship space is not just limited to the four walls of a temple, but encompasses all the spaces that initiates and motivates understanding of the Word of God in a deeper manner and meaningful to the mission of the Kingdom of God.  Here, Library, class room, refractory, playground, garden, agricultural field all becomes an extension to the worship space.  This passage also certifies the faith and vision appropriating role of Worship space.  Historically, synagogue is a space that helps one to realize divine commissions.  It is the space that interprets and explains God’s purpose and makes one to creatively respond to that.  Jesus affirms his identity here. He appropriated the vision of Isiah 61:1-2 in him.  In that passage the trito Isiah proclaims a universal vision.  That is rooted in the perception of the liberating Messiah.  That is the expectation on which generations were formed. It was in the framework of this visionary expectation all faithful individuals were formed.  Jesus places himself within this vision.  He affirmed himself as the fulfilling presence of that expectation.  It became a witness of his identity.  When Jesus selected this space to creatively respond to the mission purpose of God, he was authenticating this historical role of the worship place.   Worship is the space for the public witnessing of the called out person’s and community’s witness.
This public witnessing is an initiation into practical dimensions of the mission of the Kingdom of God.  The identity consciousness that prompted the witness formulates the mission model.  Isaiah 61:1-2 high lights the approach.  When Jesus affirmed that the paradigm is fulfilled in him, he authenticates it as the methodology of mission of the Kingdom.  The area where involvement is required points our attention to the margins.  Those at the margins are always left out.  They are either neglected or silenced.  No prominent person or community gives them value or fellowship.  Therefore, the only meaningful presence for them is God.  God alone is their refuge.  God alone is the strength to deliver from these margins.  Therefore, the needed mission methodology is to be with those who have only God as their refuge.  Give them fellowship, so that we become a witness for the presence of God with them.  It is faith in action.  It involves a preferential option for the neglected and the exploited.  Universal dimension of mission is not just to be equated with geographical universalism.  It involves preferential option for the socially, politically, economically, gender wise and other criterion wise marginalized areas.  When God is with them, they are brought to the center, because where God is, there is the center of the Kingdom of God.  Here the center is not a static reality, but a dynamic reality.  Mission is to make God experiential to those who are at the margins, so that distinction between center and margins wither away and the center becomes a dynamic reality. 



Rev. Dr. Sunni E. Mathew