Priests: Called for the Divine Ministry

Bible Passage:  Deut 6:4-5                                   
Rev. Dr. Prakash K George
                   The book of Deuteronomy is the book that reveals and reminds the Israelite community that they are a covenant community. The Covenant is an expression of God’s love and concern for them. The Book of Deuteronomy tries to define and explain this covenantal relationship of the people of Israel with God.  The Decalogue is part of it (Deut. 5:6-21) but through shema the Deuteronomistic writer gives expression to this relationship in a different dimension that is in the level of love.
             Shema is the essence or embodiment of the covenantal relation between Yahweh and Israel, following the Decalogue). It is self-evident that Jewish communities throughout history continually reflected on the Shema. Later Jewish and Christian traditions combined shema (Dt. 6:4-5) with the command love your neighbor as yourself (Lev 19:18) and presented it as the summary of law and prophets (Matthew 22; Mark 12, Luke 10). The Shema begins with the imperative Hear O Israel.  It is an address to the whole community reminding them about their identity as a called out community. Shema points to two distinctive marks of this community
Firstly The mark of the covenant community is the ability to continuously hear the voice of God – it means constantly being drawn by the word of God and being formed and re-formed by the voice of God. 
'Hear, O Israel.'" Hearing— listening—is the primary sense and skill that must be sharpened if we have to remain as true people of God. One of the major themes of Deuteronomistic writings is ‘listening’. These books make the recurring invocation to listen both to the people of Israel and to her leaders. Israelite rulers are closely tied to “listening to the words of Yahweh.” People of Israel are called to listen to the prophetic voice as the voice of God. The Book of Samuel begins with story of the call of Samuel in which he responds to God’s voice by praying “Speak Lord, for your servant is listening”. In contrast the problem with King Saul was that he could hear the voice of God but failed to listen to what God was telling him to do. So Samuel tells him “surely to obey is better than sacrifice; and to heed than the fat of the rams” I Sam 15:22. Many of Jesus parables ends with the statement “Let anyone with ears to hear listen.” In the book of revelation the messages to the seven churches each ends with the declaration “let anyone who has an ear listen to what the spirit is saying to the churches.” 
              Shema demands cautious attentiveness; it is also the prime word of prophetic language demanding serious attentiveness. For proper listening two things are essential- discernment  and trust. When there is no confidence and trust in the other we won’t listen to the other. In John 10 we hear Jesus saying that his sheep follow him because they know his voice (John 10:4).  It is a strong expression of trust and confidence in the relationship between sheep and the shepherd.  Listening also means that you are giving space to the other. As we listen to God we are allowing God to have space in our lives. That is why in the Gospel portion for this Sunday Matthew 7:24-29 a person who listens, discerns and does the will of Christ is called as a wise person. The challenge of the faith community and the disciple is to listen and to obey the words of Christ in the right spirit. The sagacious hearer listens attentively to the words of Jesus and then attempts to act responsibly as he "puts them into practice"; he is compared to the "wise man" (Mat. 7:24). Praxis is the word we see in theology and politics. Praxis points to how theory and practice fit together.
 The failure of many men and women who are called to the divine ministry is their insensitiveness to the voice of God. Discipleship means having the ability to continuously discern and listen to the voice of God. The challenge before us is to listen to God’s voice in the midst of dissonant dominant voices.   Many leaders in the Bible failed to listen to God because they obeyed the dominant voice of the people demanding them to act against the voice of God. The word vocation, as is so often pointed out, is related to voice. Thus, vocation involves God’s voice speaking to us. Our training must help us to hear the faint desperate cries of the impoverished, the vulnerable and the oppressed, for God often speaks to us through them.
We are living in a world where dominant voices try to mould and manipulate realities into commodities.
Our critical studies, devotional life, practical training and life in this community must help us to discern God’s voice. For a minister God’s call to listen is not only a call to listen to God but also to hear self, others and creation—to be a listening person. In a consumerist world we are often tempted to focus first and foremost on ourselves. The challenge before us is to cultivate the habit of listening so that we may be drawn by the voice of God, formed and reformed by the word of God.
The second distinctive mark of the covenant community is the their love and commitment to God
The Shema has its existential and theological importance within the context of a theology of covenant relations.  Shema calls to express ones unreserved and unqualified commitment to Yahweh. It is expressed through the confession "the LORD is our God, the LORD alone".  All other commitments, all other relations, are to be relative and subservient to this one. Through this confession Israel is invited to express their special relationship with God and their total allegiance to Yahweh. One of the prime functions of the Shema is “the corrective to all forms of allegiance claimed by the world.”    
       In Deut 5-11, the Israelites are repeatedly commanded to love YHWH. Deuteronomy is characterized by repetition, and it is precisely the repetitious phraseology on the micro-structural level that makes the book so memorable and effective. According to the Jewish interpretations "With all your heart" means a loyalty that is undivided . . . "With all your life [or soul]" means commitment to God even to the point of death. And "might" denotes the individual's "substance, wealth, property," all of which must be expendable in the service of God.
In contrast, the early Christian exegesis . . . viewed the three terms as designating complementary attributes of the human personality, together comprising the whole 'inner man'. The three terms do not specify different "modes of expressing love," but are three different ways of saying the same thing. The command of love has both affective (emotional) and cognitive dimensions. With all your heart" is equivalent to saying "in all your thoughts and decision making."
                          The Bible affirms love as God’s gift and as goal of authentic Christian existence. In other words love comes from God and is commanded by God. Love always implies an encounter with the other – whether it may be God or neighbor or God’s creation. Love in all its forms offers us the potential to transcend our lives in the meeting with the other.
In Deuteronomy we see this connection between God’s love and human love and a wide horizon for divine human praxis of love (Deut 10:17-20). Love of God and love of neighbor belongs together. They need to be distinguished but not to be separated.
 In the Bible love is relational praxis. We are formed through facing God and also by facing our neighbor. Only when we face the other it opens before us special revelatory moments. The very word Moses uttered first to God in his theophany experience at Mount Horeb was hinneni (here I am). Later we see Moses ministry as a continuous response to God and human sufferings by saying Here I am. For Emmanuel Levinas the hghest form of encounter is the face to face encounter with God. God addresses Israel face to face (Deut 5:4). Moses had the regular face to face experience with God (Deut 34). Meaning of this encounter must be extended and recognized in the meeting with the human other, with the orphan, the widow and the stranger.  
Karl Barth also highlights the same point of view. Barth argues that in Christian theology, the neighbor is not the abstract other but God in our own image facing us in the other. He further adds to love my neighbor as I love myself means accepting the future that is shaped by the reality of my neighbor. We are in fact given to one another in order to benefit from each other, to find the restoration that is only possible because of each other, and to find our respective identities through each other.  Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics, 401 fl. 
Jesus stands in this enduring tradition when he recites the Shema in the Gospel of Mark (12:28-33). The Shema has been affirmed, embraced, and developed from Deuteronomy to its later appropriation by Jesus in the form of the double-love commandment (see Matt 22:34-40; Luke 10:25-37), which became a supreme teaching of all commandments for subsequent followers.
Life of Jesus is the model for our ministry. His ministry was rooted in love and his ministry was always other centered, always considering the betterment of the other. It involves respect for the other; no one is looked down or humiliated but everyone finds his space, worth and place. Holding the other in love was the mark of his ministry (13:1-15).
We are living in a context where many ministers are conscious of building up their image rather than taking up a ministry of life giving, risk taking, inspiring and all embracing. Felix Wilfred narrate the story of a bishop traveling from north of Sri Lanka to the south during the period of war and violence there. Bishop was travelling with his secretary and a sister seated in the front of the car. Car of the bishop stopped by the military at several points for routine checkups and everyone had to come out of the car for this security inspection.
At one check points when the vehicle was stopped sister to spare the bishop from inconvenience of getting down and undergoing check, communicated in a telegraphic language to the soldier who knew no English. Trying to make the soldier understand in his own language she said pointing to the Bishop – “church captain”. Hearing this, the soldier let go the car. But as they continued the journey the Bishop was very upset. He asked sister “Sister don’t you know who I am? I am not the captain of the church but the General”. The paradox is that he had that of much of rank consciousness when the country was burning with violence, when thousands of people were suffering and dying. 

            A comment the Gospel writer of John makes about Jesus life and ministry as an introduction to Jesus last discourse with his disciples in that John 13: 1, “He loved them to the end”. NIV and NEB translations translate differently “he now showed them the full extent of his love.” The grammar of this sentence is the grammar of his whole life. This love for the disciples and his knowledge of kairos leads him to service of washing the feet of his fellow disciples, showing the true model of service. Jesus ministry was like a pendulum of a clock that swings continuously to his father and to the people whom he served and loved.